Former Pakistan president Pervez Musharraf, considered the architect of the 1999 Kargil war, has warned that there could be more such conflicts if the key dispute and sore point Kashmir remains unresolved for long. The retired Army General, who ruled Pakistan for nine years till last August after seizing power in a bloodless coup, acknowledged that there are a lots of mujahideen in Pakistani society and freelance jehadis who have emotional involvement with the cause of Kashmiris.

Would you term his views as immature?

According to you, what is the best way to solve Kashmir problem?

When our cricket ties with Pakistan are on hold, we should not invite people like Musharaff in India and give him so much importance. Do you support this?

Senior BJP leader and party's prime ministerial candidate L K Advani has suggested a US-style TV debate between prime ministerial candidates. He recalled in 1960 how US people gave different opinions on the Richard Nixon-John F Kennedy Presidential debates after watching it on TV and listening on radio. "Those who saw the debates on TV were debates on TV were swept off and said Kennedy was better," he said adding those who listened to the debates on radio, preferred Nixon. The presidential debate is a unique American democratic institution, an opportunity for the candidates to confront and challenge each other on personality and policy-related issues. The debate is the big moment of an election campaign, a gladiatorial-like television arena allows a nation to compare and contrast candidates.

Do you think debates can make presidents or prime minister?

Is it true that our top politicians are uncomfortable with the idea of being questioned on TV?

While a spirited TV debate can energise a section of the urban middle-class audience, it cannot reach the wider electorate. Do you agree?

According to you, which are the benefits of US-style TV debate between prime ministerial candidates?